News 2025 jannik sinner ban doping case wada statement 20250218 p5ld8r.html – Breaking News & Latest Updates 2026
Advertisement
Advertisement
This was published 1 year ago

WADA defends ban on Jannik Sinner with bizarre claim amid furore

Lachlan Harper
Lachlan Harper

Powered by

WADA has addressed the ongoing furore into Jannik Sinner's three-month ban, declaring the case "was a million miles away from doping".

The anti-doping authority appealed the initial ruling from the International Tennis Integrity Agency and had been seeking a ban of one to two years.

However, a settlement was reached of three months after Sinner's positive test for the banned substance clostebol in March 2024.

Advertisement

READ MORE: How grand final try made Dragons recruit 'a better player'

READ MORE: Legend weighs in on 'exceptional' NBA star's Boomers bid

READ MORE: 'Unlike them': Gus baffled by 'strange' Roosters calls

Sinner has consistently pleaded his innocence, declaring it was contaminated by his physiotherapist who was treating a cut with an over-the-counter spray that had the substance.

Jannik Sinner of Italy plays a backhand against Alexander Zverev of Germany in the Men's Singles Final during day 15 of the 2025 Australian Open at Melbourne Park on January 26, 2025 in Melbourne, Australia. (Photo by Quinn Rooney/Getty Images)

Jannik Sinner has been hit with a three-month ban.  Getty

Tennis players have spoken out against the three-month ruling, including Stan Wawrinka, Novak Djokovic and Nick Kyrgios.

However, WADA general counsel Ross Wenzel defended the decision.

"This was a case that was a million miles away from doping," he told BBC Sport.

Advertisement

"The scientific feedback that we received was that this could not be a case of intentional doping, including micro-dosing."

Wenzel went on to state there'd been mixed reaction to the call.

"WADA has received messages from those that consider that the sanction was too high and, in some respects, if you have some saying this is unfair on the athlete, and others saying it's not enough, maybe it's an indication that although it's not going to be popular with everyone, maybe it's an indication that it was in the right place," he said.

"When we look at these cases we try to look at them technically, operationally and we don't do it with fear of what the public and the politicians or anyone is going to say."

Most viewed in Tennis

More to explore