Lindsay Clancy case ends in a mistrial as jury deadlocks
A mistrial has been declared in the highly divisive Lindsay Clancy murder trial after jurors could not reach a verdict over whether the mother should be criminally responsible for killing her three young children.
Clancy, a 36-year-old former labour and delivery nurse, doesn’t deny strangling her children in the basement of their Massachusetts home in 2023 before trying to take her own life.
Clancy doesn’t deny strangling her children in the basement of their Massachusetts home in 2023. Greg Derr
However, her lawyer argues she is not criminally responsible for the deaths because she was suffering postpartum psychosis at the time.
Prosecutors say she knew what she was doing when she killed Cora, 5, Dawson, 3 and Callan, eight months.
The mistrial, which has come after a week of deliberations, leaves the case unresolved.
The Associated Press reported that Clancy and her family remained emotionless as the announcement was made by the judge.
Her parents and sister were escorted from the back of the courthouse without speaking to reporters.
If the jury did determine Clancy was criminally responsible for her actions, it could have convicted her of either murder or manslaughter. Charles Krupa
Clancy’s ex-husband, Patrick, who was the first witness in the trial has said in the past that he forgives Clancy and believes her actions were due to mental illness.
Medical experts across the trial have voiced different opinions about her mental state at the time she killed the children.
The 36-year-old has been paralysed ever since the night of her children’s deaths due to a several spinal cord injury she sustained after jumping from her second-storey window.
During the trial, police officers and first responders also testified that Clancy was found semiconscious lying in the backyard of the home that night with cuts to her neck in wrists.
Lindsay Clancy’s parents, Mike Musgrove, left, Paula Musgrove were escorted from the back of the courthouse without speaking to reporters. Charles Krupa
The US trial garnered widespread interest for more than a month in a case that drew attention to issues around maternal mental health post-childbirth.
The prosecutor who made the first call to lay charges on the 36-year-old said there would not be an immediate decision about a second trial, adding that public opinion would not influence any decision.
“This was and has always been about getting justice for those three little babies,” Plymouth County District Attorney Timothy Cruz said.
“This case is not about the healthcare system, or about how women are treated in it, or what diagnoses there are.”
Her defence attorney, Kevin Reddington, argued Clancy is not criminally responsible due to severe postpartum psychosis. Greg Derr
He also noted that the prosecutors were “both mothers themselves”.
The trial took a dramatic turn on Friday (Saturday AEST) when the judge announced plans to declare a mistrial, before pausing the decision to allow the defence team to appeal to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court.
However, the state’s top court ultimately declined to intervene.
Lindsay Clancy is accused of intentionally strangling her three children with exercise bands on January 24, 2023.
Prosecutors allege she planned the attack by sending her husband out of the house to pick up dinner and medication.
Her defence attorney, Kevin Reddington, argued Clancy is not criminally responsible due to severe postpartum psychosis, a rare condition triggered by post-childbirth stress, sleep deprivation, and hormonal shifts.
For help with pregnancy or new parenthood, call the PANDA Helpline on 1300 726 306 or visit panda.org.au
Share a tip-off, video or photo with us
