New zealand court rejects appeal by mosque gunman to abandon his guilty pleas 20260430 p5zsn8.html – Breaking News & Latest Updates 2026
Advertisement
Advertisement
This was published 4 months ago

Christchurch shooter to remain behind bars for life after court rejects bid to overturn conviction

April Glover and Associated Press

Powered by

An Australian white supremacist who shot and killed 51 Muslims at two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand, in 2019 has failed in an attempt to overturn his convictions.

The NZ Court of Appeal dismissed Brenton Tarrant’s claim that harsh prison conditions prompted his involuntary admission to the terrorism, murder and attempted murder charges he faced.

A panel of three judges rejected Tarrant’s bid to abandon his guilty pleas, finding it was "utterly devoid of merit".

Advertisement

NATIONAL: Major claim from interim report on Bondi terror attack

Christchurch mosque gunman Brenton Tarrant listens to victim impact statements during his sentencing hearing at Christchurch High Court. Getty

READ MORE: Natasha is leaving her 9 to 5 career behind after being made redundant twice

Tarrant, now aged 35, murdered 51 worshippers and injured dozens more in March 2019 when he drove to two Christchurch mosques and opened fire with semi-automatic weapons during Friday prayers.

Tarrant’s guilty pleas in March 2020 brought relief to bereaved families and survivors of the attack, who dreaded the prospect of a lengthy trial and feared he would use it to air his hateful views.

He was sentenced to life without parole on the murder, attempted murder and terrorism offences.

The rejection of his appeal bid – which the court noted was made 505 days after the legal deadline for it to be filed – means such a trial has once again been averted.

Tarrant, now aged 35, murdered 51 worshippers and injured dozens more in March 2019. AAP

Advertisement

READ MORE: UK PM condemns London stabbing, declared a terrorist incident

His claim of mental illness was rejected

At the court's five-day hearing in February, the attacker argued his admissions of guilt were provoked by “irrationality” induced by poor mental health, which led him to desert his racist views for a time.

The judges concluded, however, that his claims of mental illness were inconsistent and weren’t supported by prison staff, mental health professionals or lawyers who had earlier represented him.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“He was not suffering from a mental impairment or any other form of mental incapacity which rendered him unable to voluntarily change his pleas to guilty,” the judges wrote in today's ruling.

“He endeavoured to mislead us about his state of mind in a weak attempt to advance an appeal in circumstances where all other evidence demonstrated that he made an informed and totally rational decision to plead guilty.”

The court's ruling also revealed that Tarrant sought to abandon his appeal shortly after making his case at the hearing in February.

The judges rejected that bid too, writing that the case was “of significant public interest and should be finally determined".

Advertisement

They suggested that Tarrant “began to form the opinion that the hearing was not proceeding in his favour, and as a result decided to file a notice of abandonment after the hearing concluded".

New Zealand law doesn’t require judges to allow an appellant to quit an appeal bid once it’s underway.

190614 Christchurch mosque shootings Brenton Tarrant court not guilty plea crime news World New Zealand Australia

Tarrant was sentenced to life without parole on the murder, attempted murder and terrorism offences. AP/AAP

He will remain in jail for life

Advertisement
Advertisement

Tarrant, who has since fired the lawyers acting for him in February, remains in Auckland Prison, where he was sentenced in August 2020 to spend life in prison without the chance of parole.

The judges allowed him to abandon his appeal to that sentence, which was scheduled to be heard later in 2026.

The Australian-born man moved to New Zealand in 2017 with a plan to commit a mass shooting.

He amassed a cache of weapons and made a reconnaissance trip to the sites of his planned crimes before the attack.

Advertisement

The appeal court judges wrote that Tarrant had accepted the summary of facts presented to him by the police and the sentencing judge and noted that the case against him was “overwhelming.”

Evidence included footage of the attack that the shooter filmed himself and livestreamed on the internet, in which he showed his own face, and a document outlining his racist views that he published online before the attacks under his real name.

NEVER MISS A STORY: Get your breaking news and exclusive stories first by following us across all platforms.

Advertisement
Advertisement

If you or someone you know is in need of support, contact Lifeline on 13 11 14 or Beyond Blue.

email icon

Contact us

Share a tip-off, video or photo with us

More to explore