High court rules on baden clay killing 20160831 p5up4k.html – Breaking News & Latest Updates 2026
Advertisement
Advertisement
This was published 10 years ago

Baden-Clay murder conviction restored

AAP

Powered by

It has taken more than four years but the question of whether Gerard Baden-Clay meant to kill his wife Allison has finally been answered.

He murdered her.

The five-judge bench of the High Court on Wednesday morning unanimously ruled in favour of an appeal by Queensland prosecutors to overturn a decision to downgrade Baden-Clay's conviction to manslaughter.

Advertisement

Outside court, Allison's close friend Kerry-Anne Walker said the nation's highest court had confirmed what those closest to her knew from the moment she disappeared.

"Gerard Baden-Clay murdered his amazing wife Allison," she said, a yellow ribbon pinned to her clothes.

"Today's decision brings to an end Gerard's attempts to smear Allison's name."

Ms Walker said her late friend's legacy would endure through her three daughters and described her as a loving wife and mother.

The decision also marks the end of a legal process which has captured public and media attention since Baden-Clay was charged in June 2012, just weeks after his wife's body was found on a creek bank some 13km from her home.

The Court of Appeal's controversial decision to replace the former real estate agent's conviction with manslaughter in December last year drew scores of protesters to King George Square in Brisbane's CBD.

But Queensland Law Society president Bill Potts said Wednesday's outcome showed Australia's legal system was working.

"The wheels of justice grind slowly but they do grind exceedingly fine," he said.

Advertisement

The High Court found the lower court made a mistake when it concluded the jury's verdict of guilty of murder was unreasonable on the basis the prosecution had failed to exclude the hypothesis Baden-Clay had unintentionally killed his wife.

"The hypothesis on which the Court of Appeal acted was not available on the evidence," the judgement read.

"(The court's) conclusion ... was mere speculation or conjecture rather than an acknowledgment of a hypothesis available on the evidence."

For Baden-Clay's former lawyer, Peter Shields, the day marked the end of an ongoing legal and personal saga for both Gerard and Allison's families.

Advertisement
Advertisement

He said the High Court's decision would have "massive" implications for how criminal trials were handled in the future and conceded the ruling would have been different if his client had not given evidence of his own.

"He has accepted the decision, as he must," Mr Shields said, indicating he planned to meet with Baden-Clay on Friday afternoon.

He is currently serving a sentence of life imprisonment with a non-parole period of 15 years.

email icon

Contact us

Share a tip-off, video or photo with us

Most viewed in Australia

More to explore