Premier Daniel Andrews labels scathing anti-corruption report 'educational'

Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews has brushed off scathing anti-corruption findings that state government ministers and officials breached their duties as an "educational report".

Victoria's anti-corruption watchdog, the Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission (IBAC), today announced its findings that ministers and officials improperly awarded a $1.2 million contract to a union ahead of the 2018 election.

But the premier insisted the report had not pointed the finger at anyone in his government and is purely about "educating about risks".

READ MORE: Dutton responds after ratings slip in new poll

"There are no findings against anyone in this report," he said.

"The corruption commission has not found any corrupt conduct.

"We thank (IBAC) for what they term an 'educational report.'"

Andrews noted the staff members referred to in the report no longer worked for the government and said he would lead a process to consider IBAC's 17 recommendations.

"Obviously I am accountable and fundamentally responsible for driving a process to consider those recommendations," he said.

Ahead of the 2018 election, the Department of Health and Human Services entered into a contract with the Health Education Federation (HEF) to provide training to health workers.

The HEF was a new entity of the Health Workers Union (HWU).

In the report tabled in parliament today, IBAC's Operation Daintree found the decision to award the contract to the HEF did not follow a competitive tender process and a senior adviser to the then-health minister Jill Hennessy had improperly influenced the decision.

Andrews and former health ministers Hennessy and Jenny Mikakos were all cleared of corrupt conduct by the investigation but strongly rebuked in the report for the "failings" and "unethical conduct" that led to the contract's awarding.

IBAC acting commissioner Stephen Farrow said the investigation revealed breaches of duties and obligations of ministers, ministerial advisers and senior public servants.

"Our investigation showed that the HWU was given privileged access and favourable treatment in its access to ministerial offices," he said.

"The proposal from HEF raised a conflict between the government's interest in procuring the most suitable supplier for the training and the governing party's interest in assisting an affiliated union.

"This conflict of interest was not properly managed or declared."

READ MORE: Government to knock back $34b welfare boost

He said advisers in the premier's private office and the health minister's office had "interfered" to ensure the contract continued.

"The DHHS awarded the contract to HEF without a competitive procurement process due to senior staff in the department believing it was the minister's and government's preference, and because of ongoing pressure from both the Minister for Health's advisor and secretary of the union," Farrow said.

"This conduct by senior public servants falls short of the required Victorian public sector standards."

IBAC made 17 recommendations to the government following the report.

It said the recommendations will provide a clear understanding to ministers of their obligations and of their accountability for the management of ministerial staff.

The report also said the role of ministerial advisers should be more transparent and accountable.

IBAC called on the government to report back on their response to the recommendations by October 31 this year and again by June 30 next year.

READ MORE: Fox News, Dominion settle blockbuster defamation case for $1.1 billion

Sign up here to receive our daily newsletters and breaking news alerts, sent straight to your inbox.