Glen coleman ex detectives major loss after sexually touching teen 20250627 p5zetz.html – Breaking News & Latest Updates 2026
Advertisement
Advertisement
This was published 1 year ago

Ex-detective's major loss after sexually touching teen

Adelaide Lang

Powered by

A jailed sex crimes investigator has lost an appeal against his convictions for sexually touching a 19-year-old woman who came forward to report a crime.

Former NSW police detective Glen Coleman was jailed for at least two years after he was found guilty of twice sexually touching the teenager without her consent in 2022.

The 58-year-old met the teenager when she attended a police station to report her cousin had threatened to distribute naked images of her online.

Advertisement

READ MORE: Crackdown on cancer-linked 'forever chemicals' could cost Aussies big

Former detective Glen Coleman was jailed for at least two years after he was found guilty of twice sexually touching a teenager without her consent. Nick Moir

The jury was persuaded the married detective asked to see the woman's breasts, and touched them in a police station interview room and at a local park.

He also asked for sexual favours in exchange for money, attended a strip club to see her dance, and on one occasion, placed $70 on the interview room table before they had sex.

Coleman was convicted, and jailed for three years and seven months, with a non-parole period of two years and two months.

His appeal against the convictions was heard in May.

But his bid for freedom was dismissed by the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal today in a judgment by Chief Justice Andrew Bell, Justice Anthony Payne and Justice Natalie Adams.

His convictions were upheld and he will remain behind bars until at least mid-2026.

Advertisement

READ MORE: Sussan Ley determined to get more women into Liberal Party despite quota pushback

Coleman's lawyer argued the jury's findings were inconsistent because it found his client guilty of two sexual touching offences and acquitted him of seven other offences.

But crown prosecutor Carl Young said the jury's verdicts showed it had confronted difficult issues in assessing the teenager's ability to consent and Coleman's knowledge of consent.

The jury did not pick one of the lesser counts from each incident when determining its verdicts and instead based its findings on the supporting evidence for each count.

Advertisement
Advertisement

"The acquittals do not necessarily mean that the jury rejected (the teenager) as a witness or her evidence," Young said.

Support is available from the National Sexual Assault, Domestic and Family Violence Counselling Service at 1800RESPECT (1800 737 732).

email icon

Contact us

Share a tip-off, video or photo with us

Most viewed in Australia

More to explore