Deni varnhagen aflw player loses vaccine challenge court adelaide 20220927 p5ykzv.html – Breaking News & Latest Updates 2026
Advertisement
Advertisement
This was published 3 years ago

Ex-AFLW star loses court challenge over vaccine mandate

Tim Dornin and AAP

Powered by

Former Adelaide Crows player Deni Varnhagen has lost her court challenge to South Australia's COVID-19 vaccine mandate.

Varnhagen, who is also a nurse, took her case to the SA Supreme Court after a declaration under the state's Emergency Management Act required her to be vaccinated to work in the health system.

Her decision not to get the jab also resulted in the Crows placing her on their inactive list last season because of the AFL's requirements for all players to be fully vaccinated.

Advertisement

READ MORE: Anonymous hacker behind Optus breach surfaces with $1 million threat

AFLW player Deni Varnhagen is working as a labourer after being stood down for refusing to get a COVID-19 vaccine, a court has heard.

AFLW player Deni Varnhagen (left) has lost her court challenge to South Australia's COVID-19 vaccine laws. 9News

The league removed that requirement in July this year.

In a judgment today, Justice Judy Hughes found that after SA's emergency declaration in relation to the pandemic was removed earlier this year, Varnhagen's case became hypothetical and lacked utility.

In those circumstances, she said the action was dismissed.

Justice Hughes also ruled against Varnhagen on key questions of law related to the transfer of the vaccine requirements for health workers into public health laws.

READ MORE: Ten-day warning for country as 'series of weather systems loom'

Deni Varnhagen has been moved to Adelaide's inactive list after refusing to get a COVID-19 vaccine.

Deni Varnhagen was moved to the Adelaide Crows' inactive list after refusing to get a COVID-19 vaccine. Getty

Advertisement

She said that transfer, enacted by the SA parliament, was valid.

Varnhagen was initially joined in her action by five other people, another nurse, a childcare worker, a teacher and two police officers.

But only one of those, fellow nurse Courtney Millington, continued with the case.

During the Supreme Court hearings, Varnhagen argued that she was not able to make an informed decision regarding the effectiveness or the safety of any of the three COVID-19 vaccines available.

Advertisement
Advertisement

READ MORE: Russian military recruiter shot amid fear of Ukraine call-up

"I believe that, because of the directions, I am being left with no choice as to whether I receive a COVID-19 vaccine," she contended.

"I believe that I am being coerced into doing so in order to keep my employment."

Advertisement

The intensive care nurse told the court that she had not worked at Adelaide's Flinders Medical Centre since November last year and had taken a job as a labourer to meet her expenses.

READ MORE: Melbourne woman fighting for life after hit by roller coaster

Millington received one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine but decided not to have a second after suffering an adverse reaction.

Advertisement
Advertisement

She sought an exemption on medical grounds, but it was refused.

Their legal team has indicated the court decisions will be appealed.

email icon

Contact us

Share a tip-off, video or photo with us

Most viewed in Australia

More to explore